Truth matters James
Your article needs to be applied to itself - even more than it already does!
I usually hear you out James. On most issues you call out nonsense. But there are a few areas where you consider looking at “official” received recent wisdom critically to be avoided.
Beware of rejecting truth as a lie
It was going so well! A great piece - until the subtle implication that viruses are fictional is other than plain fact appeared. 😕
This is unfortunate.
But we can apply the main thrust of the article to the article itself.
James, you invite us to see the growing awareness of the HARD FACT that viruses are fictional as an “opinion” a “belief”
But
Is “viruses are fictional” an actual objectively true statement?
Are you doing precisely what you warn about? Taking a clear truth and treating it as something else - a false belief?
I don’t believe viruses are fictional James. I don’t do belief. I am aware of the hard fact that viruses are fictional. Hence the £100,000 you are offered.
Does it matter?
Yes! It is absolutely core to distinguish truth from stories as the main thrust of the article points out.
Belief is always the problem - the confusing of fiction for fact. (Certain) Belief should always be rejected - whatever the source of the stories - one’s own brain - or received wisdom.
The notion of transmission via pathogen - magically not noticed for 6000 years anywhere and plucked from the air has zero evidence backing it up. FACT. My personal £10,000 says so. Or claim it.
Inferential “proof”
Presents under a tree are compatible with the Santa hypothesis but they do not prove it.
220 years of transmission experiment have put to bed the notion that transmission of disease via a pathogen is possible whatever anecdotal filtering of experience through the lens of contagion “shows”.
Contagion is a horrible recent hoax fully picked apart now by so many people. Critical thinking and the taking of evidence seriously soon explodes it.
Science / sanity is precisely the process of distinguishing truth, observed, witnessed reality from stories.
Belief = Delusion :
ALL certainty is a lie
James you are falling into the trap - painting green-stuff (reality) as pink-stuff (story) yourself.
Of course everything we “believe” is a lie by the definition of certain belief
- treating something we DEFINITELY DON’T KNOW as if we DEFINITELY DO KNOW IT -
It’s delusion. Every time. Truth and non-truth confusion is delusion. End of. Even if the story turns out to be truth later. It was still delusion to treat it as truth when there was no evidence.
Certain belief and delusion are exactly the same concept, these are synonymous - the confusing of pink-stuff (MODEL) for green-stuff (DATA).
All certainty is delusion. All delusion is certainty. The confusion of story and truth.
All knowledge is either green-stuff or pink-stuff and distinguishing the two is what sanity / science is.
Truth is never a lie
Nothing we are AWARE OF is a lie. If we are aware of something real through witness then this is what truth is.
Real world DATA is given to us. Green-stuff. We don’t make it up and believe it. We are aware of it.
Denial never helps
There is no denying the hard fact that viruses are purely fictional - a very recent fairy-tale…
…except through the actual use of pure denial and certainty - rejection of hard evidence in favour of belief. The two go hand in hand.
Here’s a hard fact James - a fact you can’t argue with.
The Virus Confirmation Fund is now almost at £100,000 - unclaimed - ever rising.
Nobody can deny that the 50 of us have pledged to hand the money over for any evidence viruses exist.
This fact needs dealing with James. You are a sharp mind. How can this sum remain unclaimed? Many major voices have been made aware of it - including yourself now.
Many think anyone involved in spreading the contagion myth is a dodgy character. But I had a great early example in Robin Monotti
I feel he is spreading the system control fear-porn pseudoscience out of genuine confusion.
Normie virus-loving is normal (engineered)
It is not completely irrational for a Normie. to fail to examine the contagion myth. We are told from every angle in the last hundred years that “catching something” is genuinely a thing.
It is drummed into us from friends family media academia telly soaps films books celebrities masks ……
But for none-Normies, continuing to cling to the contagion myth at this stage is a serious rejection of evidence.
The presents under the tree
It has been revealed that mummy and daddy put the presents under the tree.
It is not rational to continue to believe in the Santa that they told you about. And now admit is not real.
Of course they say he is not real. “They” want you to believe he’s not real. Don’t fall for the post-truth obfuscations!
☹️
Scurvy
Scurvy was considered contagious for over a century. Why? Exact same reasons you believe you’ve witnessed contagion, or that Robin believes he witnessed contagion.
Even though nobody anywhere did for 6000 years… big clue!
Does it add up James?
Is it remotely possible that evidence exists for the existence of viruses James? and yet mainstream voices and mainstream alternative voices who claim it is a Psyop have failed to present it in so many years and claim the money to close the subject?
Is that possible?
None of us have pledged the money lightly. We are fully aware of the entire history of the pseudoscience of virology and are increasingly baffled that some in “the truth community” remain unaware.
If there was any evidence for viruses someone would have claimed the money. Don’t you think?
James, is there anyone you know who reckons they can present evidence for viruses and claim the money to settle the “debate”?
(There’s no debate here - viruses are factually fictional. Not one piece of evidence has ever been shown that they exist - or claim the money)
Hoisted by your own petard
Please James don’t fall into the everything is a lie trap yourself! Truth is not a lie.
Objective hard truth needs defending, championing, prioritising. To defeat post-truth thinking, we need to champion truth - not pretend it is pink stuff
Warm regards
Tim
p.s.
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/download/hiroshima-revisited.pdf






Three years ago I approached Corbett with a "Solutions Watch" idea that would transform and save Healthcare overnight, and not only did he not reply but suddenly Broze attacked me on X, demonising my anonymity and dismissing my 100K crowdfunder as Technocracy- before begging strangers on X for money to pay for him to vlog from some Texan townhall.
When I trawled hundreds of comments to years of Corbett's output, the consensus was that many of his Solutions went nowhere. To be fair, I've heard most of the "independent media alliance" gang reference this topic then relate it to the ton of mis/disinfo spread after 9/11 and it would seem they see the NO VIRUS REALITY as a trap- to tarnish their rep as alt media's brightest young things. And I get it- the cognitive dissonance mind melt is huge when the muggles have to go no virus, but isn't the role of investigators to, you know, investigate?
James wasn't the only big name I reached out to. You'll be shocked by the how many of the leading lights in the Health domain turned into crickets...
James is part of a whole network of “alternative” media individuals, who together formed the “independent media alliance”, and who all refuse to acknowledge the No Virus/Contagion elephant, or, if they do mention it, dismiss it as it unimportant/irrelevant, without honest or critical engagement with the evidence or open debate with its proponents. That includes Derrick Broze, Catherine Austin Fitts, Whitney Webb, Ryan Christian, and several others. To my knowledge only Kit Knightly of Off-Guardian has provided any consistent platform/quality coverage to what is THE foundational Big Lie concocted and weaponized by this transnational criminal cartel to justify their centuries-old and ongoing genocidal class war against humanity. I regard the lot of them with the utmost skepticism. Either they’re cowards or they’re dishonest actors. Either way that’s not the kind of person anyone should be looking to as an intellectual guide or leader of any sort of potential mass movement.