The only issue at point is that the fictionality of viruses is a core hard fact and people being aware of this is vital.
The centre of One Health -> Global control … as well as underpinning 99% of unnecessary damage.
In the article he basically says by pretending viruses don’t exist you avoid examining bioweapon research.
A) This demonstrates that rather than treating the fictionality of viruses as the hard fact it is, he inverts this and pretends it is not only not a clear truth … but is a factual untruth that hinders examination of a real threat.
B) It ignores that synthetic toxins are a very real source of harm - though they don’t spread
C) He facilitates future hoaxdemics, lockdowns, vaccine passports - all things he ostensibly stands against.
D) He way as well be paid by Tedros for saying things like that! He is spreading their core propaganda
Do you really think I wrote an entire detailed article in response to an article I hadn’t read? Of course I read it all.
You didn’t make me chuckle. You and James are a menace to my children as well as your own.
And you can’t ask someone to agree to disagree when it’s not a pink-stuff matter. That is a very common error.
Disagreement is for pink stuff not green stuff!
You can’t be in agreement or disagreement over green-stuff!
Green stuff is for being AWARE of. (Or unaware of / in denial of)
If I say some dogs have four legs and you say
No, they don’t. Let’s just agree to disagree,
Then there’s no way I would ever do that. I would be aware that you were denying hard reality. We don’t disagree. There are certain hard facts you’d like to airbrush out!
If you really were aware that viruses are fictional you would know that pledging money to the VCF is absolutely no risk at all. You could pledge £10,000 as I have done - knowing full well you will never have to hand any money over ever.
Depends what you mean by proof. Green stuff does not need proving - just being aware of.
Science -prophecies CAN be proved true - this is verifiable pink stuff that is not falsifiable.
“Measurements will be made that show the same measurements identified with finding an electron but with the opposite sign” for example.
Science-decideables are pink stuff but can be proved true. “There is cheese in the fridge”
But you are correct that the third class of science-fiction - the Universal hypothesis can of course never be proved true. They are inherently unverifiable.
James is part of a whole network of “alternative” media individuals, who together formed the “independent media alliance”, and who all refuse to acknowledge the No Virus/Contagion elephant, or, if they do mention it, dismiss it as it unimportant/irrelevant, without honest or critical engagement with the evidence or open debate with its proponents. That includes Derrick Broze, Catherine Austin Fitts, Whitney Webb, Ryan Christian, and several others. To my knowledge only Kit Knightly of Off-Guardian has provided any consistent platform/quality coverage to what is THE foundational Big Lie concocted and weaponized by this transnational criminal cartel to justify their centuries-old and ongoing genocidal class war against humanity. I regard the lot of them with the utmost skepticism. Either they’re cowards or they’re dishonest actors. Either way that’s not the kind of person anyone should be looking to as an intellectual guide or leader of any sort of potential mass movement.
As for truth... I never believe anything, and My father taught Me. I place probabilities of truth based on how well data explain what I see. I adjust My probabilities as new data come along that better explain what I see. And I never give 100% or 0% probability - there's always the possibility there are data I don't have.
But when the probabilities are running 95% or higher, I will make choices as if true, and when, as with viruses and contagion, the probabilities are so close to 100% that they don't exist that an atom cannot squeeze through the gap...
Well, I will be vocal and adamant!
Indeed, I have seen zero data that dispute that these are Rockefeller lies for profit and control. Thank You for being One willing to stand against the lies the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) tell Us to get Us to take poisons and be jabbed with toxins and who knows what else.
I was a long time listener and supporter of James. Him and Derek Broze started speaking with contempt about no virus people a few years ago and I've never gone back.
It seems like eventually even the people with best intentions become hypocrites.
It’s a HUUUUGE red flag that @The Corbett Report is doing this. A post that makes a great point about the process of diminishing actual truth by calling it a lie.
And then takes one of the most important truths of all and pretends it’s not truth but denial of mainstream “truth”.
James Corbett is aware of the Virus Confirmation Fund. That should be a huge red flag to him.
Why has nobody claimed the money in three years James? Surely you can put two and two together.
So many assume that anybody acting as an apologist for germ theory must be controlled opposition. James may just be a useful idiot in the same way that others are over the multipolarity con.
It doesn’t matter which side of the virus argument you are on. It’s in everyone’s interest to get to the bottom of this once and for all. Even if it did turn out that they do indeed exist in whatever shape or form (which I doubt), it will allow science to move on to the next stage. If the fact that they don’t exist can be finally accepted by a significant percentage of the general population, it will blow everything out of the water on a scale never before witnessed. The fallout will be beyond anything we can comprehend but the pain will be truly worth it.
Indeed although to be clear, there is no argument. Viruses are fictional. FACT. It’s not an opinion. People are either aware viruses are fictional or not.
From what I’ve seen and read, it seems there is zero evidence of viruses and likely never will be. But I stop short of claiming as fact as I am totally relying third parties to do the research and assume it is in good faith.
You don’t need to rely on anybody at all. Have you read the pinned post of the virus confirmation fund? If you are over 10 years old, you will have no trouble understanding the facts on the ground and the logic.
Let’s try one of the spotlights now. I bet you get it easily.
Say I claim that Santa exists and that he makes presents appear under a tree.
Say I then look on Christmas morning and find presents under a tree and use this as proof that Santa exists.
Are you able to see the fallacy?
To understand many of the other catastrophic flaws in the pseudoscience of virology - please try this.
The whole p(harm)aceutical industry, or most of it, certainly poison in the form of ‘vaccines’ rely on the virus/germ THEORY paradigm. Someone as smart as James maybe doesn’t want to appear to marginalise some of his audience.
There is more than enough evidence that contagion is a hoax, and as no one has ever proven the existence of a virus, should be enough for those seeking the truth.
Three years ago I approached Corbett with a "Solutions Watch" idea that would transform and save Healthcare overnight, and not only did he not reply but suddenly Broze attacked me on X, demonising my anonymity and dismissing my 100K crowdfunder as Technocracy- before begging strangers on X for money to pay for him to vlog from some Texan townhall.
When I trawled hundreds of comments to years of Corbett's output, the consensus was that many of his Solutions went nowhere. To be fair, I've heard most of the "independent media alliance" gang reference this topic then relate it to the ton of mis/disinfo spread after 9/11 and it would seem they see the NO VIRUS REALITY as a trap- to tarnish their rep as alt media's brightest young things. And I get it- the cognitive dissonance mind melt is huge when the muggles have to go no virus, but isn't the role of investigators to, you know, investigate?
James wasn't the only big name I reached out to. You'll be shocked by the how many of the leading lights in the Health domain turned into crickets...
I'm wary of both. Check out what Joe Olson has to say!
Great you brought this up because it's at the heart of this issue and more people must be aware: as the psyops become more technical, "experts" become more pivotal. But who licenses these experts and is their field captured or, in the case of virology, even real!?
Derrick Broze. Does the rounds on CO “alternative” media as a crusader for political justice / truth etc. Goes by the name of The Last American Vagabond. He's on Substack.
Just to be clear, the Last American Vagabond is someone else, whose name escapes me for the moment. I watched a fair bit of his output early on in the covid years. Broze is in the same circle as him and gets exposure on his platform - along with Corbett, Whitney Webb, Matt Ehret and a few others. They all say a lot of good stuff, but duck/prevaricate on other stuff - particularly "no virus" (as far as I can tell).
Whether or not they have a particular agenda, I don't know. There are all sorts of possibilities that none of us can be sure of. None of us agrees 100% with anyone else on every issue. And none of us know that we are correct in our views on things. I certainly change my mind on stuff or pause for thought when someone says something that makes me doubt what I think on a topic. Doc Malik, for example, was very reluctant to take on board "no virus" in his early days, but seems to be fully on board with it now. So we can all change our minds.
I've done a quick AI check (forgiver me my sins) and it confirms that the Last American Vagabond is definitely Derrick Broze. I remember him being introduced as such on Redacted and Tucker Carlson a couple of years ago, when I still watched that stuff. To even use the word vagabond suggests he's mocking us.
His name is Ryan Cristian. He is definitely the Last American Vagabond. You can see his channel on Odysse. He and Broze are mates, but Cristian Ryan ia for sure TLAV.
That's good news about Malik; remember he developed his practice in the most Hypochondriac pretend country on Earth. Telling a Scot that viruses don't exist is like chatting with trees.
It's so weird how he's become the Thought Police of The Freethinkers. If you've been involved in Co-op's, WOOFER and Permaculture projects then you might have noticed that these alt living attempts can be dominated and controlled by staunchly middle class or narrowly leftist creeps, both male and female. He's like the digital version of that. What beef did he have with you?
I criticized him for associating with Catherine Austin Fitts, who I said was demonstrably CO. He told me I was talking shit (his term) and asked for the evidence. So I gave it to him. He then tried to prove he was superior and a "journalist" and my (well thought out) opinion meant nothing. After I explained that the chip on his shoulder must be a real burden, he got a bit angry. But in the end I wished him well, which probably made him more angry. Oh dear.
Seems like every reporter doesn’t have to cover every topic. Corbett or Broze are not the be all end all for freedom topics. And that’s a good thing, we need many varied voices.
He is telling fundamental lies. He is popping up the massive assaults on millions of children every day. He is propping up the One Health basis of the New World Order he professes to fight.
He may as well be paid by the Rothschilds He so frequently calls out.
By posing as an independent evidence driven investigative journalist and pushing the central lies the perpetrators need to control us he shows himself as either very very stupid or compromised.
That's the Ting Tim! He evolved from a TESOL teacher to a REASON focused investigator- much needed, so why does he stop short? If the issue is adoption (of paradigm shaking) ideas, surely the aim becomes a route to acceptance?
Name calling is what children resort to when they dont get their way. As adults you can do better. I have been talking about corruption and iatrogenesis for 25 + years. Done it solo for the exact reason of avoiding others ego to want the ride. Im hoping these imdividuals claiming to be someone else are just that AI or just paid actors. If you are offended by others actions that is on you
You certainly do sound confused!
The only issue at point is that the fictionality of viruses is a core hard fact and people being aware of this is vital.
The centre of One Health -> Global control … as well as underpinning 99% of unnecessary damage.
In the article he basically says by pretending viruses don’t exist you avoid examining bioweapon research.
A) This demonstrates that rather than treating the fictionality of viruses as the hard fact it is, he inverts this and pretends it is not only not a clear truth … but is a factual untruth that hinders examination of a real threat.
B) It ignores that synthetic toxins are a very real source of harm - though they don’t spread
C) He facilitates future hoaxdemics, lockdowns, vaccine passports - all things he ostensibly stands against.
D) He way as well be paid by Tedros for saying things like that! He is spreading their core propaganda
Nuclear weapons, 911, the core contagion lie behind everything -
he lies.
I think you should try reading what he said again and think carefully about the implications .
Out of context? 😀
How can you not understand what he’s saying with this sentence?
He’s mocking the truth. He’s mocking those who care about the truth. He’s supporting the worst Hoax in history.
Do you really think I wrote an entire detailed article in response to an article I hadn’t read? Of course I read it all.
You didn’t make me chuckle. You and James are a menace to my children as well as your own.
And you can’t ask someone to agree to disagree when it’s not a pink-stuff matter. That is a very common error.
Disagreement is for pink stuff not green stuff!
You can’t be in agreement or disagreement over green-stuff!
Green stuff is for being AWARE of. (Or unaware of / in denial of)
If I say some dogs have four legs and you say
No, they don’t. Let’s just agree to disagree,
Then there’s no way I would ever do that. I would be aware that you were denying hard reality. We don’t disagree. There are certain hard facts you’d like to airbrush out!
If you really were aware that viruses are fictional you would know that pledging money to the VCF is absolutely no risk at all. You could pledge £10,000 as I have done - knowing full well you will never have to hand any money over ever.
Nothing in the article whatsoever at any point has any implication that I care whether he pledges to the VCF or not.
Stop making things up .
Well put, Tim.
Personally I'm open to believing absolutely anything, but only once proven.
One simple question that's a good test of truth, "but why?"
It's amazing how many people's operating system can't compute.
For my part I work hard to make sure I never ever believe anything under any circumstances!
If something is proven true then being aware of that is not belief it’s awareness.
Belief is treating pink stuff as green stuff. Being aware of Green stuff is not belief!
Just one giant point of note: one can never really actually prove anything.
Depends what you mean by proof. Green stuff does not need proving - just being aware of.
Science -prophecies CAN be proved true - this is verifiable pink stuff that is not falsifiable.
“Measurements will be made that show the same measurements identified with finding an electron but with the opposite sign” for example.
Science-decideables are pink stuff but can be proved true. “There is cheese in the fridge”
But you are correct that the third class of science-fiction - the Universal hypothesis can of course never be proved true. They are inherently unverifiable.
https://beyondcertainty.substack.com/p/what-is-science
James is part of a whole network of “alternative” media individuals, who together formed the “independent media alliance”, and who all refuse to acknowledge the No Virus/Contagion elephant, or, if they do mention it, dismiss it as it unimportant/irrelevant, without honest or critical engagement with the evidence or open debate with its proponents. That includes Derrick Broze, Catherine Austin Fitts, Whitney Webb, Ryan Christian, and several others. To my knowledge only Kit Knightly of Off-Guardian has provided any consistent platform/quality coverage to what is THE foundational Big Lie concocted and weaponized by this transnational criminal cartel to justify their centuries-old and ongoing genocidal class war against humanity. I regard the lot of them with the utmost skepticism. Either they’re cowards or they’re dishonest actors. Either way that’s not the kind of person anyone should be looking to as an intellectual guide or leader of any sort of potential mass movement.
Of course, James is controlled op... Heh.
As for truth... I never believe anything, and My father taught Me. I place probabilities of truth based on how well data explain what I see. I adjust My probabilities as new data come along that better explain what I see. And I never give 100% or 0% probability - there's always the possibility there are data I don't have.
But when the probabilities are running 95% or higher, I will make choices as if true, and when, as with viruses and contagion, the probabilities are so close to 100% that they don't exist that an atom cannot squeeze through the gap...
Well, I will be vocal and adamant!
Indeed, I have seen zero data that dispute that these are Rockefeller lies for profit and control. Thank You for being One willing to stand against the lies the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money) tell Us to get Us to take poisons and be jabbed with toxins and who knows what else.
I was a long time listener and supporter of James. Him and Derek Broze started speaking with contempt about no virus people a few years ago and I've never gone back.
It seems like eventually even the people with best intentions become hypocrites.
It’s a HUUUUGE red flag that @The Corbett Report is doing this. A post that makes a great point about the process of diminishing actual truth by calling it a lie.
And then takes one of the most important truths of all and pretends it’s not truth but denial of mainstream “truth”.
James Corbett is aware of the Virus Confirmation Fund. That should be a huge red flag to him.
Why has nobody claimed the money in three years James? Surely you can put two and two together.
So many assume that anybody acting as an apologist for germ theory must be controlled opposition. James may just be a useful idiot in the same way that others are over the multipolarity con.
It doesn’t matter which side of the virus argument you are on. It’s in everyone’s interest to get to the bottom of this once and for all. Even if it did turn out that they do indeed exist in whatever shape or form (which I doubt), it will allow science to move on to the next stage. If the fact that they don’t exist can be finally accepted by a significant percentage of the general population, it will blow everything out of the water on a scale never before witnessed. The fallout will be beyond anything we can comprehend but the pain will be truly worth it.
Indeed although to be clear, there is no argument. Viruses are fictional. FACT. It’s not an opinion. People are either aware viruses are fictional or not.
From what I’ve seen and read, it seems there is zero evidence of viruses and likely never will be. But I stop short of claiming as fact as I am totally relying third parties to do the research and assume it is in good faith.
It is a fact. No evidence for viruses has ever turned up. The proof of this fact is that nobody can claim the VCF.
The same is true for Santa. Santa is fictional. This is a fact.
To say something is fictional means no evidence for his existing in the real world has ever turned up
You don’t need to rely on anybody at all. Have you read the pinned post of the virus confirmation fund? If you are over 10 years old, you will have no trouble understanding the facts on the ground and the logic.
Let’s try one of the spotlights now. I bet you get it easily.
Say I claim that Santa exists and that he makes presents appear under a tree.
Say I then look on Christmas morning and find presents under a tree and use this as proof that Santa exists.
Are you able to see the fallacy?
To understand many of the other catastrophic flaws in the pseudoscience of virology - please try this.
https://virusconformationfund.substack.com/p/spacebadgerology
The whole p(harm)aceutical industry, or most of it, certainly poison in the form of ‘vaccines’ rely on the virus/germ THEORY paradigm. Someone as smart as James maybe doesn’t want to appear to marginalise some of his audience.
There is more than enough evidence that contagion is a hoax, and as no one has ever proven the existence of a virus, should be enough for those seeking the truth.
Three years ago I approached Corbett with a "Solutions Watch" idea that would transform and save Healthcare overnight, and not only did he not reply but suddenly Broze attacked me on X, demonising my anonymity and dismissing my 100K crowdfunder as Technocracy- before begging strangers on X for money to pay for him to vlog from some Texan townhall.
When I trawled hundreds of comments to years of Corbett's output, the consensus was that many of his Solutions went nowhere. To be fair, I've heard most of the "independent media alliance" gang reference this topic then relate it to the ton of mis/disinfo spread after 9/11 and it would seem they see the NO VIRUS REALITY as a trap- to tarnish their rep as alt media's brightest young things. And I get it- the cognitive dissonance mind melt is huge when the muggles have to go no virus, but isn't the role of investigators to, you know, investigate?
James wasn't the only big name I reached out to. You'll be shocked by the how many of the leading lights in the Health domain turned into crickets...
Yes, another huge red flag.
I'm wary of both. Check out what Joe Olson has to say!
Great you brought this up because it's at the heart of this issue and more people must be aware: as the psyops become more technical, "experts" become more pivotal. But who licenses these experts and is their field captured or, in the case of virology, even real!?
I've just had a run-in with Broze and think he's decidedly disingenuous, if not CO.
Who’s Broze?
Derrick Broze. Does the rounds on CO “alternative” media as a crusader for political justice / truth etc. Goes by the name of The Last American Vagabond. He's on Substack.
Oh him.
Claims to be against government but runs for Mayor twice. What a fraud! Can’t stand that guy.
More important than What They Say is Where They Lead.
Just to be clear, the Last American Vagabond is someone else, whose name escapes me for the moment. I watched a fair bit of his output early on in the covid years. Broze is in the same circle as him and gets exposure on his platform - along with Corbett, Whitney Webb, Matt Ehret and a few others. They all say a lot of good stuff, but duck/prevaricate on other stuff - particularly "no virus" (as far as I can tell).
Whether or not they have a particular agenda, I don't know. There are all sorts of possibilities that none of us can be sure of. None of us agrees 100% with anyone else on every issue. And none of us know that we are correct in our views on things. I certainly change my mind on stuff or pause for thought when someone says something that makes me doubt what I think on a topic. Doc Malik, for example, was very reluctant to take on board "no virus" in his early days, but seems to be fully on board with it now. So we can all change our minds.
It's a minefield out there.
I've done a quick AI check (forgiver me my sins) and it confirms that the Last American Vagabond is definitely Derrick Broze. I remember him being introduced as such on Redacted and Tucker Carlson a couple of years ago, when I still watched that stuff. To even use the word vagabond suggests he's mocking us.
His name is Ryan Cristian. He is definitely the Last American Vagabond. You can see his channel on Odysse. He and Broze are mates, but Cristian Ryan ia for sure TLAV.
That's good news about Malik; remember he developed his practice in the most Hypochondriac pretend country on Earth. Telling a Scot that viruses don't exist is like chatting with trees.
?? First I’ve heard. We fell out over it.
Is he not?
100% CO
Or a Control Freak, which is worse. No bali.
FOR THE RECORD: I am NOT claiming these people are controlled opposition. I'm as baffled as a post covid doctor by their focus.
It's so weird how he's become the Thought Police of The Freethinkers. If you've been involved in Co-op's, WOOFER and Permaculture projects then you might have noticed that these alt living attempts can be dominated and controlled by staunchly middle class or narrowly leftist creeps, both male and female. He's like the digital version of that. What beef did he have with you?
I criticized him for associating with Catherine Austin Fitts, who I said was demonstrably CO. He told me I was talking shit (his term) and asked for the evidence. So I gave it to him. He then tried to prove he was superior and a "journalist" and my (well thought out) opinion meant nothing. After I explained that the chip on his shoulder must be a real burden, he got a bit angry. But in the end I wished him well, which probably made him more angry. Oh dear.
I've never met a Media person, alt or regime, who didn't think they had a monopoly on reality. Failed writers have the itchiest blood.
I'd like to see the CAF evidence- say it aint so!
I also can’t bear Broze.
Seems like every reporter doesn’t have to cover every topic. Corbett or Broze are not the be all end all for freedom topics. And that’s a good thing, we need many varied voices.
He is telling fundamental lies. He is popping up the massive assaults on millions of children every day. He is propping up the One Health basis of the New World Order he professes to fight.
He may as well be paid by the Rothschilds He so frequently calls out.
By posing as an independent evidence driven investigative journalist and pushing the central lies the perpetrators need to control us he shows himself as either very very stupid or compromised.
Do you think he’s very very stupid?
That's the Ting Tim! He evolved from a TESOL teacher to a REASON focused investigator- much needed, so why does he stop short? If the issue is adoption (of paradigm shaking) ideas, surely the aim becomes a route to acceptance?
Name calling is what children resort to when they dont get their way. As adults you can do better. I have been talking about corruption and iatrogenesis for 25 + years. Done it solo for the exact reason of avoiding others ego to want the ride. Im hoping these imdividuals claiming to be someone else are just that AI or just paid actors. If you are offended by others actions that is on you
Right you are.